Which method is least effective for evaluating interpersonal skills in students?

Evaluating interpersonal skills, which are crucial for effective communication and collaboration, requires observation and engagement in social contexts. Written tests primarily assess knowledge or understanding of concepts rather than the ability to demonstrate those skills in real-life scenarios. They lack the capacity to capture nuances of interpersonal interactions, such as body language, tone, and the ability to respond in the moment.

In contrast, group projects, peer reviews, and role-playing exercises offer dynamic environments where students can actively demonstrate their interpersonal skills. Group projects facilitate collaboration and communication among peers, allowing instructors to observe teamwork and problem-solving abilities. Peer reviews encourage constructive feedback and reflection, further promoting interpersonal understanding. Role-playing exercises create realistic situations where students can practice and show their communication styles and conflict resolution skills.

Consequently, while written tests might effectively evaluate theoretical knowledge, they are not suitable for assessing interpersonal skills, making them the least effective choice among the listed methods.